So much thundered that rained. Communist Korea has the nuclear bomb. The world protests, it doesn't trust the red monarchy that pursues dreams of greatness and it starves. Nobody almost underlines that a nuclear bomb is dangerous for the one who possesses her/it and for the one who is to course of draught of the means of throwing of the holder. Without means of throwing it is dangerous if sold to the extreme terrorism

It will be almost impossible to make to release the atomic bone to the communist dog now. Sanctions, which sanctions for a country that has record of malnutrition of his/her/their children? Because China and Russia have not prohibited to the red Koreans to equip him with nuclear weapon? Will Japan continue the politics of exploitation of the American umbrella of defense that lasts from the end of the second world war? and if the economic-industrial giant nipponico will arm him as China it will react?

A thing is certain, if USA had wanted seriously to prevent Korea of the North to nuclearly arm himself/herself/themselves anybody would have stopped them, as nobody has dared to hinder them in the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The real intentions of the protagonists of the international politics will remain well dams in the cassefortis of the secret of State. To the analysts it doesn't stay that - in base to the knowledge of the facts, of the situations global and regional, of the political trends here developed since to be hypothesized deducible sceneries.

It seems logical to hypothesize, for instance, that the nuclear proliferation among the smaller powers essentially has bursts of equilibrium towards the State or of States you oppose regional (Israel, India, Pakistan, China) and defensive against the strapotere of USA. questions you sweep, sees in a limited circle, they would be able not to be also convicts, but analyzed in a world vision they set in evidence the deadly danger of the nuclear proliferation to chain that would bring to the new dangerous world disorder

If then, nuclear availability is granted to regimes not democrats and even friends of the international terrorism, the danger of nuclear conflicts does more and more him probable.

China now protests that Korea has shown his/her entry in the nuclear club, for two possible motives or mind, or you/he/she has realized to have made a serious error not to prevent Korea of the North to equip him with nuclear weapon or anchor, the fear of an American reaction in commercial sense and of support to the Japanese rearmament, the candle of communist ideological solidarity is not worth.